Many AI models depend on detailed datasets scraped from sources such as social media, public records, and commercial transactions. Often, individuals whose data becomes part of such datasets are unaware of the ways in which their information is being used. Unlike traditional data collection, AI can aggregate information from seemingly unrelated sources, creating comprehensive profiles that go far beyond what users might have reasonably expected. This aggregation can reveal intimate details about individuals, raising significant ethical and legal questions about the right to privacy in the digital age.
Securing meaningful consent for data collection is a considerable challenge in AI development. Consent forms are often lengthy, filled with jargon, and presented as a prerequisite for service, effectively compelling users to agree without fully understanding the extent of data sharing. This lack of transparency erodes trust and can result in users unknowingly handing over sensitive information. AI systems that continue to learn and adapt may also use data far beyond the scope originally agreed upon, complicating the principle of consent still further.
AI’s ability to monitor behavior and infer personal traits enables new forms of surveillance and profiling. Systems like facial recognition or behavioral tracking can monitor movements or predict preferences, often without the informed consent of those being observed. This level of scrutiny can chill free expression and personal autonomy, especially when combined with state or corporate surveillance initiatives. The resulting power asymmetry between data gatherers and the subjects of data collection raises profound questions about the boundaries of privacy in modern society.